<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>SheGeeks - Latest Comments in Twitter Is Not Just For Geeks and Definitely Not For Money</title><link>http://shegeeks.disqus.com/</link><description>Creating Conversations Using Technology &amp; Social Media</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 06:50:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twitter Is Not Just For Geeks and Definitely Not For Money</title><link>http://shegeeks.net/twitter-is-not-just-for-geeks-and-definitely-not-for-money/#comment-4385840</link><description>Twitter is good in gaining popularity among like-minded people. I am addicted.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rifchia</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 06:50:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Is Not Just For Geeks and Definitely Not For Money</title><link>http://shegeeks.net/twitter-is-not-just-for-geeks-and-definitely-not-for-money/#comment-4143560</link><description>I still don't know what is the business model of Twitter but what the heck, just use it while it's still free and worry later.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">globalrs</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 06:27:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Is Not Just For Geeks and Definitely Not For Money</title><link>http://shegeeks.net/twitter-is-not-just-for-geeks-and-definitely-not-for-money/#comment-758896</link><description>Totally agree. Twitter is not for geeks. I am not a geek although I was called so when I firstly tried Twitter in the early day, but I am totally not a geek in any way. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Movies, music, lifestyles, restaurants, foods, etc. are something I (and some of my friends) share via Twitter.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">EscRiBiTioNiSt®</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:25:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Is Not Just For Geeks and Definitely Not For Money</title><link>http://shegeeks.net/twitter-is-not-just-for-geeks-and-definitely-not-for-money/#comment-757867</link><description>Corvida, great post. In other words, twitter is for everyone and it's what you make of it.  You get out of it what you put in.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">warrenss</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:22:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Is Not Just For Geeks and Definitely Not For Money</title><link>http://shegeeks.net/twitter-is-not-just-for-geeks-and-definitely-not-for-money/#comment-757803</link><description>Mind you, I'm not criticizing your choice of words. You're simply using the expression in common use today. I'm just poking fun at how political correctness doesn't always make much sense.  The term homemaker, for instance, though out-of-date, seems to me more of a positive, uplifting word. Stay-at-home sounds like the poor woman isn't allowed to leave the house :-) Anyway, not really on-topic. Sorry. Enjoyed our chat.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GregClinton</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:13:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Is Not Just For Geeks and Definitely Not For Money</title><link>http://shegeeks.net/twitter-is-not-just-for-geeks-and-definitely-not-for-money/#comment-757663</link><description>No clue. What else would you suggest calling them though. Fits the bill if you ask me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Corvida</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:56:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Is Not Just For Geeks and Definitely Not For Money</title><link>http://shegeeks.net/twitter-is-not-just-for-geeks-and-definitely-not-for-money/#comment-757089</link><description>Twitter is also for gamers!! My friends and I use it to keep in touch with people from our gaming alliances.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bukolae</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:47:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Is Not Just For Geeks and Definitely Not For Money</title><link>http://shegeeks.net/twitter-is-not-just-for-geeks-and-definitely-not-for-money/#comment-756105</link><description>Wondering how the expression stay-at-home-mom became politically correct.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GregClinton</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:53:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Is Not Just For Geeks and Definitely Not For Money</title><link>http://shegeeks.net/twitter-is-not-just-for-geeks-and-definitely-not-for-money/#comment-755729</link><description>Corvida, I totally agree with you. We geeks tend to be first at these things, but Twitter is the sort of thing that's useful to everyone--they just need to give it a shot.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Somehow I don't think that article was worth your well-reasoned response though. The guy who wrote it is from here (&lt;a href="http://www.cornwallseo.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.cornwallseo.com/&lt;/a&gt;), and it's quite obvious that they're just linkbaiting...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Personally, whenever I hear the term "social media marketing expert" I always cringe a bit ;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">devindra</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:11:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Is Not Just For Geeks and Definitely Not For Money</title><link>http://shegeeks.net/twitter-is-not-just-for-geeks-and-definitely-not-for-money/#comment-755681</link><description>Love the passion. Couldn't agree more.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tokerud</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:04:30 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>