<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>SheGeeks - Latest Comments in Private: When Did the iPhone Become an Invention?</title><link>http://shegeeks.disqus.com/</link><description>Tech news, tools, and reviews in plain English.</description><atom:link href="https://shegeeks.disqus.com/when_did_the_iphone_become_an_invention/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:03:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Private: When Did the iPhone Become an Invention?</title><link>http://shegeeks.net/when-did-the-iphone-become-an-invention/#comment-25338303</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe it was because Apple tried to market it as a whole new thing, and a lot of people bought into that marketing.  For example, they heavily advertised its ability to hold and play music.  Although other phones could already do that, Apple really tried to portray it as a device that was a true combination of cell phone and music player.  I agree with you that it probably shouldn't qualify as a "new" invention.  This is just my best guess as to why other people don't see it that way.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">EmilyK</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:03:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>